A Systematic Literature Review of Welfare Sanctions and Racial Equity

Stephanie Walsh

Rutgers University

Jessica Roman

Rutgers University

Amanda Parker

U.S. Government Accountability Office

Andrea Hetling

Rutgers University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24926/jsepa.v1i2.4788

Keywords: TANF, Welfare, Sanctions, Street-Level Organizations, Social Policy, Equity


Abstract

In the United States, welfare sanctions are designed to enforce compliance with program rules and are the most tangible and, in some cases, detrimental enforcement mechanism for recipients of public cash assistance. Whether or not they are equitably administered is critical to our understanding of the program and of safety net enforcement mechanisms across the sector. Using electronic databases of peer-reviewed articles across disciplines, this systematic literature review resulted in a deeper understanding of the research conducted related to racial inequities and welfare sanctions. The 29 studies included in this analysis highlight different rates and effects of sanctions for recipients depending on race and ethnicity. Findings are synthesized and recommendations for future research are presented.


Author Biographies

Stephanie Walsh, Rutgers University

Stephanie Walsh, PhD (she/her) (Stephanie.Walsh@ejb.rutgers.edu) is a researcher at the Heldrich Center at Rutgers University. Her research focuses on improving programs, including cash assistance and workforce development initiatives, to better support the economic stability and well-being of vulnerable populations.

Jessica Roman, Rutgers University

Jessica Roman, MPP (she/her) (jroman@eagleton.rutgers.edu) graduated with her Master of Public Policy degree from the Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy and now works for the Eagleton Institute of Politics at Rutgers University. Jessica holds a bachelor’s degree in psychology from The College of New Jersey.

Amanda Parker, U.S. Government Accountability Office

Amanda Parker, MPP (she/her) (abparke2@gmail.com) received her Master of Public Policy degree at the Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy and is now working for the U.S. Government Accountability Office. Amanda holds a bachelor’s degree in global studies and sustainability from the University of Illinois.

Andrea Hetling, Rutgers University

Andrea Hetling, PhD (she/her) (ahetling@rutgers.edu) is a professor at the Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy at Rutgers University. Her research focuses on how public programs and policies can support economic well-being and financial stability among vulnerable populations, including families living in poverty and survivors of intimate partner violence.


References

Andrews, Kristine, Jenita Parekh, and Shantai Peckoo. 2019. “How to Embed a Racial and Ethnic Equity Perspective in Research: Practical Guidance for the Research Process. ” Washington, DC: Child Trends.

Barnes, Carolyn Y. 2021. “‘It Takes a While to Get Used to’: The Costs of Redeeming Public Benefits.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31 (2): 295–310. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaa042

Barnes, Carolyn Y and Julia R Henly, “‘They Are Underpaid and Understaffed’: How Clients Interpret Encounters with Street-Level Bureaucrats.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 28 (2): 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy008

Bloom, Dan, and Don Winstead. 2002. Sanctions and Welfare Reform. Welfare Reform and Beyond Initiative, Brookings Institution.

Brodkin, Evelyn Z., and Malay Majmundar. 2010. “Administrative Exclusion: Organizations and the Hidden Costs of Welfare Claiming.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20 (4): 827–848. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mup046

Brown, K. Steven, Kilolo Kijakazi, Charmaine Runes, and Margery Austin Turner. 2019. “Confronting Structural Racism in Research and Policy Analysis.” Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

Caiola, Courtney, Thomas P. McCoy, and Shawn M. Kneipp. 2020. “Modeling Upstream Socioeconomic Inequities and Syndemic Conditions among Mothers over Time.” Public Health Nursing 38 (2): 186–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.12831

Cancian, Maria, Jennifer L. Noyes, and Marci Ybarra. 2012. “The Extended TANF Application Period and Applicant Outcomes: Evidence from Wisconsin.” Social Work Research 36 (4): 273–288. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/svs054

Center for Evaluation Innovation, Institute for Foundation and Donor Learning, Dorothy A Johnson. 2017. Center for Philanthropy, Luminare Group. Equitable Evaluation Framing Paper. Equitable Evaluation Initiative.

Chang, Yu-Ling, Lucia Marina Lanfranconi, and Kevin Clark. 2020. “Second-Order Devolution Revolution and the Hidden Structural Discrimination? Examining County Welfare-to-Work Service Systems in California.” Journal of Poverty 24 (5–-6): 430-450. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875549.2020.1728010

Cheng, Tyrone C. 2009. “Racial Inequality in Receiving Transitional Support Services and Being Sanctioned among TANF Recipients: A Group Threat Hypothesis.” Journal of Social Service Research 35(2): 115-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488370802678835

Cheng, Tyrone C., and Celia C. Lo. 2018. “Explaining Restrictive TANF Policies: Group Threat Hypothesis and State Economy Conditions.” Journal of Social Service Research 44 (4): 529–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2018.1477698

Cheng, Tyrone, Celia Lo, and Joe Weber. 2017. “Racial Disparities in Welfare Dependence and Financial Independence: Links to Human Capital, Local Economy, and State Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Policies.” Journal of Social Service Research 43 (1): 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2016.1235070

Crewe, Sandra Edmonds. 2003. “From Paper to People: An Analysis of Critical Welfare Reform Issues Affecting the Black Community.” In African American Social Workers and Social Policy, ed. Tricia B. Bent-Goodley, 69–92.i

Crewe, Sandra Edmonds. 2002. “Motivated but Fearful: Welfare Reform, Disability, and Race.” Journal of Health & Social Policy 16 (1-2): 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1300/J045v16n01_06

Dewey, John. The Public and Its Problems. 1927. Athens: Ohio University Press.

Fording, Richard C., Joe Soss, and Sanford F. Schram. 2007. “Devolution, Discretion, and the Effect of Local Political Values on TANF Sanctioning.” Social Service Review 81(2): 285–316. https://doi.org/10.1086/517974

Fording, Richard C., Joe Soss, and Sanford F. Schram. 2011. “Race and the Local Politics of Punishment in the New World of Welfare.” American Journal of Sociology 116 (5): 1610–1657. https://doi.org/10.1086/657525

Fording, Richard C., Sanford F. Schram, and Joe Soss. 2013. “Do Welfare Sanctions Help or Hurt the Poor? Estimating the Causal Effect of Sanctioning on Client Earnings.” Social Service Review 87 (4): 641–676. https://doi.org/10.1086/674111

Gooden, Susan T. 2006. “Addressing Racial Disparities in Social Welfare Programs: Using Social Equity Analysis

to Examine the Problem.” Journal of Health & Social Policy 22 (2): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1300/J045v22n02_01

Herd, Pamela, and Moynihan, Donald. P. 2019. Administrative Burden: Policymaking by Other Means. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Hetling, Andrea, Stephanie Holcomb, David Seith, Annette Riordan, Juan Santiago, Jessica Roman, Stephanie Lupinacci, and Amman Seehra. 2022. “An Equity Analysis of Applying for Welfare: TANF Application and Denial Reasons by Household and County Characteristics.” Social Service Review 95(4). https://doi.org/10.1086/717298

Hupe, Peter, and Aurélien Buffat. 2014. “A Public Service Gap: Capturing Contexts in a Comparative Approach of Street-Level Bureaucracy.” Public Management Review 16 (4): 548–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.854401

Kalil, Ariel, Kristin S. Seefeldt, and Hui-chen Wang. 2002. “Sanctions and Material Hardship under TANF.” Social Service Review 76 (4): 642–662. https://doi.org/10.1086/342998

Keiser, Lael R., Peter R. Mueser, and Seung-Whan Choi. 2004. “Race, Bureaucratic Discretion, and the Implementation of Welfare Reform.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (2): 314–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00072.x

Lanfranconi, Lucia M., Yu-Ling Chang, Aditi Das, and Paul J. Simpson. 2020. “Equity versus Equality: Discourses

and Practices within Decentralized Welfare-to-Work Programs in California.” Social Policy & Administration 54 (6): 883–899. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12599

Lee, Kyoung Hag, and Dong Pil Yoon. 2012. “A Comparison of Sanctions in African American and White TANF Leavers.” Journal of

Evidence-Based Social Work 9 (4): 396–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/15433714.2011.552035

Lens, Vicki. 2008. “Welfare and Work Sanctions: Examining Discretion on the Front Lines.” Social Service Review 82 (2): 197–222. https://doi.org/10.1086/589706

Lens, Vicki, and Susan Elizabeth Vorsanger. 2005. “Complaining after Claiming: Fair Hearings after Welfare Reform.” Social Service Review 79 (3): 430–453. https://doi.org/10.1086/430892

Lipsky, Michael. 1980. Street-Level Bureaucracy Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. 1980. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Lindhorst, Taryn, Ronald J. Mancoske, and Alice Abel Kemp. 2000. “Is Welfare Reform Working? A Study of the Effects of Sanctions on Families Receiving Temporary Assistance to Needy Families.” Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare 27 (4): 185–201.

Marchevsky, Alejandra, and Jeanne Theoharis. 2008. “Dropped from the Rolls: Mexican Immigrants, Race, and Rights in the Era of Welfare Reform.” Journal of Sociology. & Social Welfare 35 (3). https://doi.org/10.15453/0191-5096.3357

McDaniel, Marla, Tyler Woods, Eleanor Pratt, and Margaret Simms. 2017. “Identifying Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Human Services: A Conceptual Framework and Literature Review.” OPRE Report #2017-69. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Meyers, Marcia K., Bonnie Glaser, and Karin Mac Donald. 1998.”On the Front Lines of Welfare Delivery: Are Workers Implementing Policy Reforms?.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management: 17 (1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(199824)17:1%3C1::AID-PAM1%3E3.0.CO;2-I

Meyers, Marcia. 1998. Gaining Cooperation at the Front Lines of Service Delivery: Issues for the Implementation of Welfare Reform. Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government, State University of New York.

Monnat, Shannon M. 2010. “The Color of Welfare Sanctioning: Exploring the Individual and Contextual Roles of Race on TANF Case Closures and Benefit Reductions.” Sociological Quarterly 51 (4): 678–707. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2010.01188.x

Ojeda, Christopher, Anne M. Whitesell, Michael B. Berkman, and Eric Plutzer. 2019. “Federalism and the Racialization of Welfare Policy.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 19 (4): 474–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532440019873700

Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996. P.L. 104-193, 110 STAT. 2105.

Pipinis, Dimitris. 2017. “Punitive White Welfare Bureaucracies: Examining the Link between White Presence within Welfare Bureaucracies and Sanction Exits in the United States.” Social Service Review 91 (1): 71–105. https://doi.org/10.1086/690831

Riccucci, Norma M. 2002. “Implementing Welfare Reform in Michigan: The Role of Street-Level Bureaucrats.” International Journal of Public Administration 25 (7): 901–921. https://doi.org/10.1081/PAD-120004110

Rodgers Jr, Harrell R., Lee Payne, and Serguei Chervachidze. 2006. “State Poverty Rates: Do the New Welfare Policies Make a Difference?.” Review of Policy Research 23 (3): 657–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2006.00222.x

Schram, Sanford F. 2005. “Contextualizing Racial Disparities in American Welfare Reform: Toward a New Poverty Research.” Perspectives on Politics 3 (2): 253–268. https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759270505019X

Schram, Sanford F., Richard C. Fording, and Joe Soss. 2008. “Neo-Liberal Poverty Governance: Race, Place and the Punitive Turn in US welfare policy.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 1 (1): 17–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsm001

Schram, Sanford F., Joe Soss, Richard C. Fording, and Linda Houser. 2009. “Deciding to Discipline: Race, Choice, and Punishment at the Frontlines of Welfare Reform.” American Sociological Review 74 (3): 398–422. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F000312240907400304

Selekman, Rebekah K. 2014. “The Caseworker as a Source for Program Information: Understanding the Importance of the Work Environment.” Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance 38 (3): 228–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2013.878014

Shantz, Katie, Heather Hahn, Mary Nelson, Matt Lyons, and Ann Flagg. 2020. “Changes in State TANF Policies in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Washington, DC: Urban Institute 500.

Soss, Joe, Richard C. Fording, and Sanford F. Schram. 2008. “The Color of Devolution: Race, Federalism, and the Politics of Social Control.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (3): 536–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00328.x

Soss, Joe, Richard Fording, and Sanford F. Schram. 2011. “The Organization of Discipline: From Performance Management to Perversity and Punishment.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21 (2): i203–i232. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq095

Spencer, Rachael A., Melvin D. Livingston, Briana Woods-Jaeger, Shelby T. Rentmeester, Nolan Sroczynski, and Kelli A. Komro. 2020. “The Impact of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, Minimum Wage, and Earned Income Tax Credit on Women’s Well-Being and Intimate Partner Violence Victimization.” Social Science & Medicine 266: 113355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113355

Wang, Julia Shu-Huah. 2020. “State TANF Time Limit and Work Sanction Stringencies and Long-Term Trajectories of Welfare Use, Labor Supply, and Income.” Journal of Family and Economic Issues 42: 650–696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-020-09714-8

Watkins-Hayes, C. 2011. Race, Respect, and Red Tape: Inside the Black Box of Racially Representative Bureaucracies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(Supplement 2), i233–i251. https://doi.org10.1093/jopart/muq096

Woodson, Tanisha Tate. 2021. Using a Culturally Responsive and Equitable Evaluation Approach to Guide Research and Evaluation. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica.

Wu, Chi-Fang. 2008. “Severity, Timing, and Duration of Welfare Sanctions and the Economic Well-Being of TANF Families with Children.” Children and Youth Services Review 30 (1): 26–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2007.06.009

Wu, Chi-Fang, Maria Cancian, and Geoffrey Wallace. 2014. “The Effect of Welfare Sanctions on TANF Exits and Employment.” Children and Youth Services Review 36: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.10.022