Journal of Social Equity and Public Administration

Ambiguous Policies, Controversial Issues, and Strained Bureaucracies: Banning Critical Race Theory in Idaho

Luke Fowler

Boise State University

Jen Schneider

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24926/jsepa.v2i2.5655

Keywords: policy ambiguity, critical race theory

---

Abstract

Absent coping strategies, ambiguity strains administrative agencies and democratic institutions on multiple fronts, particularly where controversy is amplified by different ways of thinking that are incompatible with each other. This is examined using a case study of the implementation of Idaho’s House Bill 377 (HB377), the first state-level ban on “critical race theory” in public education in the United States. The brief and ambiguously written bill leaves a lot to be “figured out” by educators. Using a modified grounded theory approach, interviews with 10 faculty reveal how making sense of HB377 caused significant distress for faculty and strained their relationships with administrators. Findings suggest that this bill may have damaged higher education institutions in Idaho, particularly by creating low faculty morale among those teaching in areas newly perceived to be controversial. Conclusions consider implications for administrative agencies when faced with ambiguous laws and conflicting messages from elected officials.

---

Author Biographies

Luke Fowler, Boise State University

Luke Fowler (he/him) (lukefowler@boisestate.edu) is a professor of public administration and faculty director of Boise State University’s School of Public Service. His research interests include policy implementation, state and local government, and environmental policy).

Jen Schneider

Jen Schneider (she/her) (jenschneider@boisestate.edu) is a professor of public policy and associate dean of Boise State University’s College of Innovation & Design. Her research interests include public engagement, communication, energy policy, and higher education leadership.

---

References

Arnold, Gwen. 2021. “Distinguishing the Street-level Policy Entrepreneur.” Public Administration 99 (3): 439–453.

Baex, Bien, and Mitchel Y. Abolafia. 2002. “Bureaucratic Entrepreneurship and Institutional Change: A Sense-Making Approach.” Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory 12 (4): 525–552.

Bernier, Luc, and Taieb Hafsi. 2007. “The Changing Nature of Public Entrepreneurship.” Public Administration Review 67(3): 488–503.

Blesset, Brandi, Jennifer Dodge, Beverly Edmond, Holly T. Goerdel, Susan T. Gooden, Andrea M. Headley, Norma M. Riccucci, and Brian N. Williams. “Social Equity and Public Administration: A Call to Action.” Perspectives on Public Management & Governance 2 (4): 283–299.

Burnett, L.D. 2020. “Right-Wing Trolls Attacked Me. My Administration Buckled.” Chronicle of Higher Education, October 15. [online] Available at: https://www.chronicle.com/article/right-wing-trolls-attacked-memy-administration-buckled

Corbin, Clark. 2021. “A Look Inside Idaho’s Unredacted McGeachin Task Force Files.” Idaho Capital Sun, October 6. [online] Available at: https://idahocpitalsun.com/2021/10/06/a-look-inside-idahos-unredactedmcgeachin-task-force-files/

Davis, Randsall S., and Edmund C. Stazyk. 2016. “Examining the Links between Senior Managers’ Engagement in Networked Environments and Goal and Role Ambiguity.” Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory 26 (3): 433–447.

Davis, Randall S., and Edmund C. Stazyk. 2022. “Ambiguity, Appraisal, and Affect: Examining the Connections between Goal Perceptions, Emotional Labour, and Exhaustion.” Public Management Review 24 (10): 1499–1520.

Flaherty, Colleen. 2021. “Professors Faced Threats after Appearing on Website.” Inside Higher Ed, May 4. [online] Available at: https://www.insidehighered.com/quicktakes/2021/05/04/professors-faced-threatsafter-appearing-website

Fowler, Luke. 2019. “Problems, Politics, and Policy Streams in Policy Implementation.” Governance 32 (3): 403–420.

Fowler, Luke. 2021. “How to Implement Policy: Coping with Ambiguity and Uncertainty.” Public Administration 99 (3): 581–597.

Fowler, Luke. 2022. “Using the Multiple Streams Framework to Connect Policy Adoption to Implementation.” Policy Studies Journal 50 (3): 615–639.

Fowler, Luke. 2023a. Democratic Policy Implementation in an Ambiguous World. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

Fowler, Luke. 2023b. “Is Ambiguity Good or Bad for Democratic Governance?” Perspectives on Public Management & Governance 6 (2–3): 94–105.

Fowler, Luke. 2023c. “Strategies for Dealing with Policy Ambiguities.” Public Administration 101 (4): 1394–1407.

Gluckman, Nell. 2021. “A University Suspended Diversity Courses because of an Incident That Almost Certainly Didn’t Happen.” Chronicle of Higher Education, May 24. [online] Available at: https://www.chronicle.com/article/a-university-suspended-diversity-courses-because-of-an-incident-that-almost-certainly-didnt-happen?cid2=gen_login_refresh&cid=gen_sign_in

Goldberg, Michelle. 2021. “The Social Justice Purge at Idaho Colleges.” New York Times, March 27. [online] Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/26/opinion/free-speech-idaho.html

House Bill 377, Sixty-Sixth Idaho Legislative Session. 2021. [online] Available at: https://legislature.idaho.gov/wp-content/uploads/sessioninfo/2021/legislation/H0377.pdf

Herd, Pamela, and Donald P. Moynihan. 2019. Administrative Burden: Policymaking by Other Means. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Hill, Heather C. 2003. “Understanding Implementation: Street-level Bureaucrats’ Resources for Reform.” Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory 13 (3): 265–282.

Hupe, Peter, and Michael Hill. 2007. “Street-level Bureaucracy and Public Accountability.” Public Administration 85 (2): 279–299.

Jenkins-Smith, Hank C., Daniel Nohrstedt, Christopher M. Weible, and Karin Ingold. 2018. “The Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Overview of the Research Program.” In Theories of the Policy Process ed. C.M. Weible and P.A. Sabatier. New York: Routledge.

Jung. Chan S. 2013. “Organizational Goal Ambiguity and Job Satisfaction in the Public Sector.” Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory 24 (4): 955-981.

Kingdon, John. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, 2nd ed. New York: HarperCollins.

KTVB Staff. 2021. “House Bill 377 Passes Idaho Senate Following Student Testimony.” KTVB.com, April 26. [online] Available at: https://www.ktvb.com/article/news/local/208/house-bill-377-passes-id-senate/277-31cc98f3-70ef-4492-93da-de4e93dbdd7f

Lapuente, Victor, and Kohei Suzuki. 2020. “Politicization, Bureaucratic Legalism, and Innovative Attitudes in the Public Service.” Public Administration Review 80 (3): 454–467.

Lavee, Einat, and Nissim Cohen. 2019. “How Street-level Bureaucrats Become Policy Entrepreneurs: The Case of Urban Renewal.” Governance 32 (3): 475–492.

Lipsky, Michael. 2010. Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services, 30th Anniversary Expanded Edition. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Luker, Kristin. 2010. Salsa Dancing into the Social Sciences: Research in an Age of Info-Glut. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Maynard-Moody, Steven, and Shannon Portillo. 2010. “Street-level Bureaucracy Theory.” In The Oxford Handbook of American Bureaucracy ed. R.F. Durant, 252–277. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Meier, Kenneth J. 2019. “Theoretical Frontiers in Representative Bureaucracy: New Directions for Research.” Perspectives on Public Management & Governance 2 (1): 39–56.

Moore, Mark H. 1995. Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Morgan, Douglas, Kelly G. Bacon, Ron Bunch, Charles D. Cameron, and Robert Deis. 1996. “What Middle Managers Do in Local Government: Stewardship of the Public Trust and the Limits of Reinventing Government.” Public Administration Review 56 (4): 359–366.

Morris, Edwin K. 2018. “Inversion, Paradox, and Liberal Disintegration: Towards a Conceptual Framework of Trumpism.” New Political Science 41 (1): 17–35.

Moynihan, Donald M., and Alasdair Roberts. 2021. “Dysfunction by Design: Trumpism as Administrative Doctrine.” Public Administration Review 81 (1): 152–156.

Noordegraaf, Mirko 2000. “Professional Sense-Makers: Managerial Competencies Amidst Ambiguity.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 13 (4): 319–332.

Office of Lieutenant Governor Janice McGeachin. 2021. Press Release: Idaho Lt. Governor Assembling Task Force to Examine Indoctrination in Idaho Education Based on Critical Race Theory, Socialism, Communism, and Marxism. [online] Available at: https://

www.idahostatejournal.com/freeaccess/idaho-lieutenant-governor-assembling-task-force-to-examine-indoctrination-in-education-system/article_c515bfc6-8a5f-5e96-a035-2ab07ca0cf31.html

Pandey, Sanjay K., and Bradley E. Wright. 2006. “Connecting the Dots in Public Management: Political Environment, Organizational Goal Ambiguity, and the Public Manager’s Role Ambiguity.” Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory 16 (4): 511–532.

Peters, B. Guy, and Jon Pierre. 2004. Politicization of the Civil Service in Comparative Perspective: The Quest for Control. New York: Routledge.

Rainey, Hal G., and Chun S. Jung. 2015. “A Conceptual Framework for Analysis of Goal Ambiguity in Public Organizations.” Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory 25 (1): 71–99.

Ray, Rashawn, and Alexandra Gibbons. 2021. “Why Are States Banning Critical Race Theory?” Brookings Institute, November. [online] Available at: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/fixgov/2021/07/02/why-arestates-banning-critical-race-theory/

Richert, Kevin 2021. “Analysis: How Critical Race Theory Turned into the Political ‘Bogeyman.” Idaho Education News, July 1. [online] Available at: https://www.idahoednews.org/news/analysis-how-critical-race-theory-turned-into-a-political-bogeyman/

Siciliano, Michael D., Nienke M. Moolenaar, Alan J. Daly, and Yi-Hwa Liou. 2017. “A Cognitive Perspective on Policy Implementation: Reform Beliefs, Sensemaking, and Social Networks.” Public Administration Review 77 (6): 889–901.

Stazyk, Edmund C., and Holly T. Goerdel. 2011. “The Benefits of Bureaucracy: Public Managers’ Perceptions of Political Support, Goal Ambiguity, and Organizational Effectiveness.” Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory 21 (4): 645–672.

Stewart, Debra W. 1985. “Professionalism vs. Democracy: Friedrich vs. Finer Revisited.” Public Administration Quarterly 9 (1): 13–25.

Taylor, Jeannette. 2014. “Organizational Culture and the Paradox of Performance Management.” Public Performance & Management Review 38 (1): 7–22.

Teres-Martinez, Andrea. 2021. “Students and Faculty Uncertain about Impacts of House Bill 377.” The Arbiter, October 8. [online] Available at: https://arbiteronline.com/2021/10/08/students-and-faculty-uncertainabout-impacts-of-house-bill-377/

Tracy, Sarah J. 2013. Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.

Van Dooren, Wouter, and Mirko Noordegraaf. 2020. “Staging Science: Authoritativeness and Fragility of Models and Measurement in the COVID-19 Crisis.” Public Administration Review 80 (4): 610–615.

Walters, Daniel. 2021. “Idaho Activists Are Trying to Make ‘Equity’ and ‘Social Justice’ Taboo on College Campuses.” Inlander, May 6. [online] Available at: https://www.inlander.com/spokane/idaho-activists-are-trying-to-make-equity-and-social-justice-taboo-oncollege-campuses/Content?oid=21609855

Weick, Karl E., Kathleen M. Sutcliffe, and David Obstfeld. 2005. “Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking.” Organization Science 16 (4): 409–421.

West, William F. 1984. “Structuring Administrative Discretion: The Pursuit of Rationality and Responsiveness.” American Journal of Political Science 28 (2):340–360.

Wood, B. Dan, and John Bohte. 2004. “Political Transaction Costs and the Politics of Administrative Design.

Journal of Politics 66 (1): 176–202.

Wood, B. Dan, and Richard W. Waterman. 1991. “The Dynamics of Political Control of the Bureaucracy.” American Political Science Review 85 (3): 801–828.