Are Virtual Meetings More Equitable? An Evaluation of City Council Meeting Participation in San Diego
Dominika Bukalova
San Diego State University
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4039-1857
Joshua Chanin
San Diego State University
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2939-0658
Elizabeth Maland
Retired City Clerk for the City of San Diego
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24926/jsepa.v4i1.6841
Keywords: public meetings, virtual public meetings, local government
Abstract
Few studies have investigated the impacts of the recent shift to virtual meetings on public participation and no known studies have explored the implications of e-participation on advancing equity in public administration. This study investigates the frequency of nonagenda public comment provided at city council meetings, comparing participation during in-person meetings to participation during virtual meetings. Our analysis, based on five years of data, reveals that overall participation increased when virtual meeting technologies were incorporated. We found that female participation surpassed male participation in meetings that offered virtual participation options. These findings highlight how virtual meeting technology impacts public participation, how it may encourage female participation, and advance gender equity in public administration.
Author Biographies
Dominika Bukalova, San Diego State University
Dominika Bukalova (she/her/hers) (dbukalova@sdsu.edu) is an assistant professor in the School of Public Affairs at San Diego State University. Dominika has also worked in local government, most recently as chief of staff to the San Diego City Council President. Her research focuses on public sector leadership and local government administration.
Joshua Chanin, San Diego State University
Joshua Chanin (he/him/his) (jchanin@sdsu.edu) is a Professor in the School of Public Affairs at San Diego State University, where he teaches courses in public administration, criminal justice, and law. His research examines police reform and transparency.
Elizabeth Maland, Retired City Clerk for the City of San Diego
Elizabeth Maland (she/her/hers) (eandcusethis@gmail.com), retired City Clerk for San Diego, oversaw a department of 49 employees which provided meeting support, records management, and election coordination. A Brown University graduate, she worked for San Diego for over 30 years and received recognition for her work in access improvement.
References
Adams, Brian. 2004. “Public Meetings and the Democratic Process.” Public Administration Review 64 (1): 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00345.x
Baker, William H., H. Lon Addams, and Brian Davis. 2005. “Critical Factors for Enhancing Municipal Public Hearings.” Public Administration Review 65 (4): 490–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00474.x
Beyer, Scott. 2020. “The Case for Making Virtual Public Meetings Permanent.” Governing, September 1. https://www.governing.com/now/the-case-for-makingvirtual-public-meetings-permanent.html
Bishu, Sebawit G. 2020. “Gender Equity in the Workforce.” In Achieving Social Equity: From Problems To Solutions, edited by Mary E. Guy and Sean A. McCandless, 15–27. Melvin & Leigh, Publishers.
Bobbio, Luigi. 2019. “Designing Effective Public Participation.” Policy and Society 38 (1): 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2018.1511193
Burby, Raymond J. 2003. “Making Plans That Matter: Citizen Involvement and Government Action.” Journal of the American Planning Association 69 (1): 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360308976292
Burns, Nancy. 2007. “Gender in the Aggregate, Gender in the Individual, Gender and Political Action.” Politics & Gender 3 (1): 104–124. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X07221014.
Burns, Nancy, Kay Lehman Schlozman, Ashley Jardina, Shauna Shames, and Sidney Verba. 2018. “What’s Happened to the Gender Gap in Political Participation?: How Might We Explain It?” In 100 Years of the Nineteenth Amendment: An Appraisal of Women’s Political Activism, edited by Holly J. McCammon and Lee Ann Banaszak, 69–104. Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190265144.003.0004
Clark, Jill K. 2018. “Designing Public Participation: Managing Problem Settings and Social Equity.” Public Administration Review 78 (3): 362–374. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12872
Clark, Jill, Kip Holley, Glennon Sweeney, Camryn Reitz, Alannah Glickman, Christina Allen, and Jason Reece. 2024. “Social Equity of Public Participation Environments.” Journal of Social Equity and Public Administration 2 (1): 91–107. https://doi.org/10.24926/jsepa.v2i1.5229
Coffe, Hilde, and Catherine Bolzendahl. 2010. “Same Game, Different Rules? Gender Differences in Political Participation.” Sex Roles 62 (5): 318–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9729-y
De Piccoli, Norma, and Chiara Rollero. 2010. “Public Involvement in Social and Political Participation Processes: A Gender Perspective.” Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 20 (3): 167–183. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.1027
Di Gennaro, Corinna, and William Dutton. 2006. “The Internet and the Public: Online and Offline Political Participation in the United Kingdom.” Parliamentary Affairs 59 (2): 299–313. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsl004
Di Giovanna, Pooja Bachani, and Michael Huling. 2021. “California Cities Look to Incorporate Digital Public Engagement Beyond the Pandemic.” August 9. https://icma.org/blog-posts/california-cities-look-incorporatedigital-public-engagement-beyond-pandemic
Di Giovanna, Pooja Bachani, and Alexander DeSantis. 2022. “Digital Equity and Public Engagement.” PM Magazine, December 1. https://icma.org/articles/pm-magazine/digital-equity-and-public-engagement
Ebdon, Carol. 2002. “Beyond the Public Hearing: Citizen Participation in the Local Government Budget Process.” Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management 14 (2): 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-14-02-2002-B006
Einstein, Katherine Levine, Maxwell Palmer, and David M. Glick. 2019.”Who Participates in Local Government? Evidence from Meeting Minutes.” Perspectives on Politics 17 (1): 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759271800213X
Einstein, Katherine Levine, David Glick, Luisa Godinez Puig, and Maxwell Palmer. 2022. “Still Muted: The Limited Participatory Democracy of Zoom Public Meetings.” Urban Affairs Review 59 (4): 1279–1291. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874211070494
Fiorino, Daniel J. 1990. “Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 15 (2): 226–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399001500204.
Fuller, Jill E. 2004. “Equality in Cyberdemocracy? Gauging Gender Gaps in On‐Line Civic Participation.” Social Science Quarterly 85 (4): 938–957. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.00252.x
Fung, Archon. 2006. “Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance.” Public Administration Review 66 (1): 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00667.x
Fung, Archon. 2015. “Putting the Public Back into Governance: The Challenges of Citizen Participation and Its Future.” Public Administration Review 75 (4): 513–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12361
Gil De Zuniga, Homero, Eulalia Puig-I-Abril, and Hernando Rojas. 2009. “Weblogs, Traditional Sources Online and Political Participation: An Assessment of How the Internet Is Changing the Political Environment.” New Media & Society 11 (4): 553–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809102960
Gooden, Susan, Richard Gregory Johnson III, Sean McCandless, and RaJade Berry-James. 2023. “The Journal of Social Equity and Public Administration: From Vision to Victory.” Journal of Social Equity and Public Administration 1 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.24926/jsepa.v1i1.4770
Guy, Mary, and Brian Williams. 2023. “A Journal Dedicated to Social Equity and Public Administration.” Journal of Social Equity and Public Administration 1 (1): 13–18. https://doi.org/10.24926/jsepa.v1i1.4824
Hock, Scott, Sarah Anderson, and Matthew Potoski. 2013. “Invitation Phone Calls Increase Attendance at Civic Meetings: Evidence from a Field Experiment.” Public Administration Review 73 (2): 221–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02627.x
Holman, Mirya R. 2017. “Women in Local Government: What We Know and Where We Go from Here.” State and Local Government Review 49 (4): 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X17732608
Irvin, Renee A., and John Stansbury. 2004. “Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is it Worth the Effort?” Public Administration Review 64 (1): 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00346.x
Jacques, Lindsay. 2020. “Reflecting on Virtual Public Meetings.” ICMA, May 27. https://icma.org/articles/article/reflecting-virtual-public-meetings#:~:text=Michael%20Webb%2C%20city%20manager%2C%20Edwardsville%2C,those%20outside%20of%20the%20community
Jung, N., Kim, Y., and de Zuniga, H. G. 2011. “The Mediating Role of Knowledge and Efficacy in the Effects of Communication on Political Participation.” Mass Communication and Society 14 (4): 407–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2010.496135
Kamal, Sameea. 2023. “California Boards Want to Keep Pandemic Rules for Public Meetings. Critics Call It Bad for Democracy.” CalMatters, September 22. https://calmatters.org/politics/2023/08/public-meetings-california/
Kim, Soonhee, and Jooho Lee. 2012. “E-Participation, Transparency, and Trust in Local Government.” Public Administration Review 72 (6): 819–828. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02593.x
King, Cheryl Simrell, Kathryn M. Feltey, and Bridget O’Neill Susel. 1998. “The Question of Participation: Toward Authentic Public Participation in Public Administration.” Public Administration Review 58 (4): 317–326. https://doi.org/10.2307/977561
Krueger, Brian S. 2002. “Assessing the Potential of Internet Political Participation in the United States: A Resource Approach.” American Politics Research 30 (5): 476–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X02030005002
Little Hoover Commission. 2021. “The Government of Tomorrow: Online Meetings. Report #261.” Little Hoover Commission, State of California, June 2021. https://lhc.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/lhc.ca.gov/files/Reports/261/Report261.pdf
Lowndes, Vivien, Lawrence Pratchett, and Gerry Stoker. 2001. “Trends in Public Participation: Part 2—Citizens’ Perspectives.” Public Administration 79 (2): 445–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00264
MacLean, Don, and Ryad Titah. 2022. “A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Research on the Impacts of e-Government: A Public Value Perspective.” Public Administration Review 82 (1): 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13413
McCandless, Sean, and Brandi Blessett. 2022. “Dismantling Racism and White Supremacy in Public Service Institutions and Society: Contextualizing the Discussion and Introducing the Symposium.” Administrative Theory & Praxis 44 (2): 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2022.2043071
McCandless, Sean, and Mary E. Guy. 2020. “The Social Equity Imperative.” In Achieving Social Equity: From Problems To Solutions, edited by Mary E. Guy and Sean A. McCandless, 1–12. Melvin & Leigh, Publishers.
McComas, Katherine, John C. Besley, and Laura W. Black. 2010. “The Rituals of Public Meetings.” Public Administration Review 70 (1): 122–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02116.x
Meijer, Albert. 2015. “E-Governance Innovation: Barriers and Strategies.” Government Information Quarterly 32 (2): 198–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.01.001
Mossberger, Karen, Caroline J. Tolbert, and Ramona S. McNeal. 2007. Digital Citizenship: The Internet, Society, and Participation. MIT Press.
Nabatchi, Tina, and Matt Leighninger. 2015. Public Participation for 21st Century Democracy. John Wiley & Sons.
National Freedom of Information Coalition. 2025. “State Freedom of Information Laws.” Accessed March 14, 2025, from https://www.nfoic.org/state-freedom-of-information-laws/
Office of the California Attorney General, State of California Department of Justice. 2003. “The Brown Act: Open Meetings for Local Legislative Bodies.” https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/media/the-brown-act.pdf
Oldenburg, Ramon, and Dennis Brissett. 1982. “The Third Place.” Qualitative Sociology 5 (4): 265–284.
Polletta, Francesca, and Pang Ching Bobby Chen. 2013. “Gender and Public Talk: Accounting for Women’s Variable Participation in the Public Sphere.” Sociological Theory 31 (4): 291–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275113515172
Ruess, Christina, Christian Pieter Hoffmann, Shelley Boulianne, and Katharina Heger. 2021. “Online Political Participation: The Evolution of a Concept.” Information, Communication & Society 26 (8): 1495–1512. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.2013919
Sanchez-Vitores, Irene. 2019. “Different Governments, Different Interests: The Gender Gap in Political Interest.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 26 (3): 348–369. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxy038
Steinbach, Malte, Jost Sieweke, and Stefan Sus. 2019. “The Diffusion of E-Participation in Public Administrations: A Systematic Literature Review.” Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce 29 (2): 61–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/10919392.2019.1552749
Tolbert, Caroline J., and Ramona S. McNeal. 2003. “Unraveling the Effects of the Internet on Political Participation?” Political Research Quarterly 56 (2): 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290305600206
Twizeyimana, Jean Damascene, and Annika Andersson. 2019. “The Public Value of E-Government—A Literature Review.” Government Information Quarterly 36 (2): 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.001
Verba, Sidney, and Norman H. Nie. 1987. Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. University of Chicago Press.
Verba, S., Burns, N., and Schlozman, K. L. 1997. “Knowing and Caring about Politics: Gender and Political Engagement.” Journal of Politics 59 (4): 1051–1072. https://doi.org/10.2307/2998592
Vogels, Emily A. 2021. “Digital Divide Persists Even as Americans With Lower Incomes Make Gains in Tech Adoption.” Pew Research Center, June 22. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2021/06/22/digital-divide-persists-even-as-americans-with-lower-incomesmake-gains-in-tech-adoption/
West, Darrell M. 2005. “Equity and Accessibility in E-Government: A Policy Perspective.” Journal of E-Government 1 (2): 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1300/J399v01n02_03
Wihlborg, Elin, Fredrik Carlsson, and Agneta Blom. 2022. “Towards Zoomocracy—An Explorative Study on Virtual Democratic Decision Making in Swedish City Council Meetings in the Wake of the Covid-19 Pandemic.”Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2022.318
Williamson, Anne R., and Michael J. Scicchitano. 2014. “Dimensions of Public Meeting Participation: Evidence from Florida’s Truth-in-Millage Act.” Urban Affairs Review 50 (1): 134–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087413480463
Wolak, Jennifer. 2022. “Conflict Avoidance and Gender Gaps in Political Engagement.” Political Behavior 44 (1): 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-020-09614-5
Zheng, Yueping. 2017. “Explaining Citizens’ E-Participation Usage: Functionality of E-Participation Applications.” Administration & Society 49 (3): 423–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399715593313

